The Blemish

Do Not Want

By , 10:54 AM on Dec 10, 2008, 5 Comments

Khloe Kardashian PETA

Having Khloe Kardashian be the latest “celebrity” to model for ’s “I’d rather go naked than wear fur” campaign may not have been the brightest of ideas. Rumor has it that when devout followers were shown this ad, they wept while slaughtering as many chinchillas as they could to make a coat big enough to cover her ugly ass.

Tags: # #
Or from other sites

Editor's Web Picks

  • director

    Fur is renewable, durable, long-lasting, reusable, recyclable, biodegradable, energy and resource efficient. Reputable furriers use absolutely No endangered species. The Fur Trade accounts for approximately one-quarter of one percent of animals that humans use for food, clothing and other purposes. Millions of unwanted pets are put down in shelters each year and then there are millions more killed on the roads. Fur is a Natural Product. Farmed animals are fed fish and meat leftovers (proteins) unfit for human consumption therefore greatly recycling millions of pounds of food-waste annually. Fur farms use very little electricity, fossil fuels or water (unlike synthetic furs) and animal byproducts become a slew of other products. Nothing is Wasted! Synthetics are made from petroleum, a non-renewable resource, which does Not support sustainable use of the environment. If wearing fur brings you joy then enjoy. Let people be, folks. Wearing fur is not the issue, it is how animals are treated. If you care, then change that.

  • Melissa

    Y MUST U PEOPLE HATE ON KHLOE?!!!! SHE LOOKS AMAZING IN THIS PHOTO. HER BIG ASS IS BEAUTIFUL, JEALOUS MUCH??

  • Brandi

    She is not ugly at all…
    Asshole.

  • http://theblemish.com Victor

    That bush on her head was probably copy and pasted from the one between her legs.

  • chewy

    fat asses must be a kardashian gene.