ESC

Do not want

Having Khloe Kardashian be the latest “celebrity” to model for PETA’s “I’d rather go naked than wear fur” campaign may not have been the brightest of ideas. Rumor has it that when devout PETA followers were shown this ad, they wept while slaughtering as many chinchillas as they could to make a coat big enough to cover her ugly ass.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
director
director
15 years ago

Fur is renewable, durable, long-lasting, reusable, recyclable, biodegradable, energy and resource efficient. Reputable furriers use absolutely No endangered species. The Fur Trade accounts for approximately one-quarter of one percent of animals that humans use for food, clothing and other purposes. Millions of unwanted pets are put down in shelters each year and then there are millions more killed on the roads. Fur is a Natural Product. Farmed animals are fed fish and meat leftovers (proteins) unfit for human consumption therefore greatly recycling millions of pounds of food-waste annually. Fur farms use very little electricity, fossil fuels or water (unlike synthetic… Read more »

Melissa
Melissa
15 years ago

Y MUST U PEOPLE HATE ON KHLOE?!!!! SHE LOOKS AMAZING IN THIS PHOTO. HER BIG ASS IS BEAUTIFUL, JEALOUS MUCH??

Brandi
Brandi
15 years ago

She is not ugly at all…
Asshole.

chewy
chewy
15 years ago

fat asses must be a kardashian gene.