<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lindsay Lohan back to men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theblemish.com/2009/04/lindsay-lohan-back-to-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theblemish.com/2009/04/lindsay-lohan-back-to-men/</link>
	<description>Better than a slap to the face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chewy</title>
		<link>http://theblemish.com/2009/04/lindsay-lohan-back-to-men/#comment-61981</link>
		<dc:creator>chewy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblemish.com/?p=34913#comment-61981</guid>
		<description>skank! and her boobs are sagging. her vh1 special is just around the corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>skank! and her boobs are sagging. her vh1 special is just around the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixie</title>
		<link>http://theblemish.com/2009/04/lindsay-lohan-back-to-men/#comment-61967</link>
		<dc:creator>pixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblemish.com/?p=34913#comment-61967</guid>
		<description>Suprised no, saddened slightly, yes. Prefer &quot;monogamous Lindsay&quot; to whorish monster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suprised no, saddened slightly, yes. Prefer &#8220;monogamous Lindsay&#8221; to whorish monster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmm</title>
		<link>http://theblemish.com/2009/04/lindsay-lohan-back-to-men/#comment-61961</link>
		<dc:creator>emmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblemish.com/?p=34913#comment-61961</guid>
		<description>Gross. I thought she was so much more attractive with meat on her. How can anyone think that stick-figure is attractive, not to mention, healthy? Her boobs looked better when she had a little weight on her too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gross. I thought she was so much more attractive with meat on her. How can anyone think that stick-figure is attractive, not to mention, healthy? Her boobs looked better when she had a little weight on her too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 1.791 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 310/311 objects using disk: basic

Served from: theblemish.com @ 2012-02-12 11:02:23 -->
