The Selena Gomez Topless Photo Is Fake | The Blemish

The Selena Gomez Topless Photo Is Fake

By on January 19, 2011
selena-gomez-pca1

Hollyscoop was approached with a supposed topless photo of that was taken with a camera phone. I assume they saw it because they said “we’re not going to publish the photo because we can’t verify that she was over 18 when it was taken.” They say the photo was taken inside a bathroom by someone else and Selena is posing in front of a closed door.

Regardless, the photo is fake. Sources tell TMZ that Selena and her people are angry that her reputation is being tarnished by a pervert with Photoshop and that any site publishing it will be hit with a cease and desist and possibly a lawsuit. “The alleged photo of Selena Gomez is absolutely not her. Selena’s family is pursuing all available remedies to deal with the offender.”

That’s great and all but either my Google skills suck today or no one has even published the fakes (censored version here). Basically this story could have been summed up with just “Tits or GTFO!”

  • Peoples Choice Awards Show
  • Peoples Choice Awards Show
  • Peoples Choice Awards Show
  • Peoples Choice Awards Show
  • Peoples Choice Awards Show
  • Peoples Choice Awards Show
Related
anne-hathaway-turquoise
Anne Hathaway to Play Catwoman
halle-berry-globes
Gabriel Aubry Files For Custody
Related Stories
Web Finds
kanye-hoodie
More Finds
  • EAD

    This is for certain a fake photo! Because as you can see on this photo there is no mole (or Beauty mark) on her right breast. The REAL Selena Gomez has one there.

    • Lleckey

      U r a perv how would u know she has
      one on her breast

  • Ssilentwaiting

    This is a lie. The image is most definitely fake.

    there is the fact that on Selena’s face, the flash of the camera was much more intense which causes a bright glare, while the rest of the body does not have as much glare.

    oh and of course i can’t forget the irrefutable proof of THE ORIGINAL PICTURE OF SELENA! (http://i51.tinypic.com/oumple.jpg) and boom goes the dynamite! i give you the original picture from which Selena’s face was cut out of. She was at the LAX airport on January 23, 2009.

    • Joshua Salazar

      Dude!! Thx for clearing up the original pic

      -JOSH-

  • Violeta

    The photo is fake. I’ve seen that particular photo since last year. It was featured on a site that included other fake photos of celebrities. I was really surprised to find out that the infamous photo that got everyone talking about was actually the fake photo I saw last year. The photo is obviously fake, No mole on her breast and she has never had a dang mullet. Plus the bathroom in that photo looks like something you would find in Eastern Europe. Fake.

  • Aw090

    Im pretty sure when doing topless pictures you don’t go for a haggard I could use a a good nights sleep look. Her hairs is a mess and she looks like she just stepped off a plane. To me that right there says it is a fake. This was definitely not a sexy picture Other than that the photoshopping looks pretty realistic and I no nothing of whether she has a mole or not.

    • Jack Hill

      Its REAL, just google it.

  • MAVERICK517

    The Selena Photo is definitely a fake. The necklace is the joint where her head was combined with a photo of a nude body. Simply zoom in on the necklace until you see the pixels and you can clearly see that the borders of the necklace do not match the skin tones. It was definitely Photoshopped.

  • Gizmo

    Her tits aint that size no way

  • Llleckey

    You r all dicks u r. Also bitches leave her personal life alone peeved

  • DHLTech&Wep

    Now my turn, the photo is fake. Why? Here is why, if you notice the setting of the place it look like trash. If it is her I believe it would be much better decor, and even if Justin took the pictutre it is Justin’s house. He still won’t have a shit like home, and if guys look even closer yes there is a beauty mark on her right chest. But it other photo the marks is much more darker and visible. I did a little math the scale the of the photo the mark is about 4 inches from right shoulder to center. In other photo the mark is about 3 inches from rigt shoulder to center. So reply what you think about my anaylzisis. Oh you might be wondering how I know. I have been a pro ( more like expert not real pro) expert at tech, weapons, and photo and video editing. So I pretty much know the fake from real. If this does turn out to be real, then I have to have a little talk with my teacher.

  • Ferret1993@yahoo.com

    What you have to remember is that on some cameras, the image is reversed from what the image really looked like. If you would, look at the left breast. Notice that mole-like mark in the spot where the “real” mole would be if the image was reversed? I’m not saying this is proof, but it’s reasonable doubt. No doubt the “original” image posted in the comments is close, but in the “topless” photo, the head is tilted to be straight again. If this is fake, the pervert really took his/her time into the details.

  • Diamond1107

    Okay it’s hidden and I’m not a perv I just sick of paparazzi she does really have a dot on her right boob and it is there you just can’t see it cause it’s so small I can see it

  • Diamond1107

    Okay it’s hidden and I’m not a perv I just sick of paparazzi she does really have a dot on her right boob and it is there you just can’t see it cause it’s so small I can see it

  • Mindtrip9

     nice that is the exact photo….maybe 1 day there will be a real one maybe…

  • Soulja4thalord

    He really is not a perv there is a pic she took for mag cover and her dress is so low in the breast spot that on her right upper breast there is a mole and not that hard to miss soooooo choke on that and die