ESC

They whored out the baby

Jamie Lynn Spears

Jamie Lynn Spears and her mother have not yet been paid for their OK! Magazine interview. That’ll happen when the baby is born as all parties have agreed to a $1 million payday for a photoshoot with the future bastard child. The reason for the small sum is because Jamie isn’t internationally known and naturally, it wouldn’t make sense if they can’t sell magazines overseas. TMZ explains,

Sources close to Britney’s family tell TMZ it all started when Britney melted down on an OK! Magazine photo shoot. Britney’s mom, Lynne, read the article (who didn’t?!) and called OK! personally to thank them “for handling it so well.” She stayed in touch with OK!, and called them this week when she learned that news of Jamie’s pregnancy was about to break. Her only requirement? Keep Britney out of it. This is about Jamie Lynn. “She trusted them to do it in a way that would be sympathetic to her daughter,” our source says.

Sources also say Jamie may be more than 12 weeks pregnant and the baby may be due in spring. There’s a lesson to be learned from this whole debacle. It’s that if you’re somewhat famous, mildly retarded, know nothing about sex and the guy you’re with impregnates you, accept nothing short of $1 million to whore out your unborn. Anything less is an insult.

Besides all this teenage pregnancy stuff, there hasn’t been a lot of mention that her boyfriend is 19 and she’s only 16. I keep expecting Chris Hansen from Dateline to pop-up at any moment and shake his head in disapproval, but he hasn’t. Oh… wait.

Chris Hansen

3
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
DavidCyndib Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Cyndib
Guest
Cyndib

What I just can’t seem to understand is, how can the kids channel Nick employ a pregnant teen and keep it wholesome for kids to watch? Won’t every teeny bopper want to be like Zoey 101 star Jamie Lynn and be a mommy too. I would fire her so fast. And what about Disney, come on they didn’t fire Vanessa Hudgens for the nude photos at the tender age of 17. I would have just to let the other teen stars that immoral behavior will not be tolerated. What message does that send to teenagers every where? To be popular… Read more »

David
Guest
David

That shows you how prude YOU and the rest of this country are! Jamie Spears gets pregnant and suddenly, she’s treated like trash. Vanessa Hudgens has nude photos and suddenly, she’s a slut! What the frick is wrong with this country we live in?!

David
Guest
David

And, since you brought up Vanessa Hudgens in your post first, for your information, there is a such thing as good nudity! It’s in the BIBLE! You can’t say Vanessa belongs in playboy if she’s naturally nude for she was created nude, as was the rest of the world! As a matter of fact, when God created Adam and Eve, they were naked and not ashamed…and His creation was good! How can it be good one minute and evil the next? Answer that one!

Latest
Load more