Khloe Kardashian is confusing

You may have noticed last week that Khloe Kardashian became the latest to pose naked in PETA’s anti-fur campaign. The caption read: “Fur? I’d rather go naked.” Her stance seemed firm. But, this marked the beginning of her lies. Sort of.

A couple days later, photos of Khloe glamming it up in a fur coat were posted on the web and people were appalled for five minutes. Then they went back to eating their bagel. Today, Khloe addressed those hypocritical photos on her blog. The lesser Kardashian wrote:

As some of you might have seen today, there are several people who have taken to the web calling me a hypocrite and posting photos of me wearing fur.

The reason PETA approached me initially is because in my past I did wear fur and they wanted to educate me on the brutal ways in which animals are skinned for their pelts.  After watching their video once, I was so horrified that I immediately swore off fur.  The cruel treatment I saw had a great impact on me and I am deeply hurt that people are trying to criticize me for uneducated choices I made in my past that I now regret terribly.

I do know there are tons of photos where I am wearing fur pieces so this is to be expected, but I just wanted to let you know the real story behind my conscious decision and compassionate change of heart.

I have changed my ways and I hope that many other people will as well.

Praise jesus. Khloe is reformed. Or is she? Deceiver took a trip to the Kardashian clothing store, Dash, and noted that they sell a lot of leather jackets and accessories. As some are quick to point out, leather is made from cow and that is a PETA no-no.

So is Khloe still a hypocrite? Maybe. Who cares. The important thing is Khloe stop going naked. Who told her that was a good idea anyway? Certainly not me. Was it you? It was you, wasn’t it? Ooo, you make me so mad.