ESC

Megan Fox is sorry

megan-fox-denied-04

Last week, Megan Fox was photographed completely ignoring a little boy (MeganLover95) who was trying to give her a rose. She even looked a little bit annoyed. At the time, many people (me) attributed this to the kid having really bad b.o. But, as Megan explains in this interview with Collider, that wasn’t the case.

Megan alleges she was in sensory overload with the thousands of screaming people and the blinding flashes from paparazzi cameras. She then apologizes to the kid and tells him that she would gladly accept his flower.

Oh, sure. She says that now, but when you’re lying naked in her bed clenching the flower in your teeth, all you get is a punch in the balls and a call to the cops. Don’t believe her little kid. It’s a trap!

Video of the apology below. That dork probably just came in his pants.

[flashvideo filename=http://cache.theblemish.com/videos/2009/06/megan-fox-flower.flv width=500 height=375 /]

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Potsie
Potsie
10 years ago

Fuck the little fucker. I am tired of the country being run by a 7-year-old from Cedar Rapids named Timmy. We can’t show that on TV because Timmy might see; we talk about that because Timmy might hear. We can’t twist Megan’s nipples until she cums because Timmy wants to give her a rose first.

Give me 30 minutes with Megan Fox, then afterward I’ll ass-rape little Timmy for good measure.

Little fuck.

Fuck.

chewy
chewy
10 years ago

that was a boy?!?! all this time i thought it was a portly female fan.

haha
haha
10 years ago

i agree with chewy my initial reaction but i think its a little scary that sum1 can get 10 or less inches from sum celebrity what if instead of a flower he had a knife gun or sword

deadlocked
deadlocked
10 years ago

you can get 10 or less inches from someone irregardless of whether they’re a celebrity or not. You think celebrities deserve special treatment?

TaimaSan
TaimaSan
10 years ago
Reply to  deadlocked

did you write irregardless? you are an idiot. that is not a word.

Voice of Reason
Voice of Reason
10 years ago
Reason?
10 years ago

Read the websites you tell “idiot’s” to read…
“There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.”

the oppinion voicer
the oppinion voicer
10 years ago

LOl you guys are turds, what are you 10 years old, honestly! Your frikin immature weirdo stalker freak think you know it all cum sucking….. Let hot people be is what “I” say….

Latest
Load more