Is… is that Jennifer Aniston’s vag?
The New York Post must be staffed by a bunch of perverts because they published a partial image of Jennifer Aniston’s vag from when she was on set shooting scenes for her movie, The Bounty. Mark this in your calendar. This is the most interesting thing Jennifer Aniston has done to date. The photos of her topless don’t count because she had to sic her attorneys on everyone.
That’s Gerard Butler stuffing her into the trunk and not me by the way. So you can stop calling the cops. I haven’t made good on my plans. Yet. Ultra HQ version here. Scan of the NY Post page via Gawker below. So what do you think guys? Do we have partial vagina? Yay or nay?
For those thinking it’s a stunt double, added two more pics. Yea, that last one is debatable now that you mention it. So, stunt double?
Oh my god. This is the best picture I could have ever asked for.
Jenn is the Hotest Women on the plant, she shouldn’t settle down with any 1 man, but spread the wealth
Oh puh-leez. You can fantasize that she has nothing on if you want, but do you REALLY think she would do a scene wearing a skirt where she’s thrown in a trunk without wearing underwear? Most like she has a thong along with the most pathetic group of drooling fools for fans.
Actually on second though it hardly shows anything.
That is a stunt, so it is probably a body double.
Yeah, I agree with Cpm – somehow that leg looks too thick to be Jen’s. Actually.. is that a man? I mean, the way that foot is jammed into that heel. It looks a bit man-ish. Its exactly the way my boyfriend’s feet look when he’s prancing around in my heels. Come to think of it, that’s the way his legs look when we make whoopie. So maybe the question should be.. “is that Jen’s lady gaga?”
Obviously anyone who think this photo shows anything is an idiot who has never seen a woman naked before because this, ladies, is not a vulva.
She has black underwear on.
no meat curtain but looks a little like a side shot
lol @ the last pic he put up to “prove” it’s not a body double
most obvious photoshop ive seen in a long time
That definately is not any woman’s VaJJ. A VaJJ is in line with a woman’s butt crack. If you follow that line on down, that leads totally “way off kelter.”
The hands look a bit manish also! Her legs are know way that thick. And even if it were to be her, you can very visibly tell that there are black panties on. Your just seeing a bit of cheek because they are t-backs!
Seriously? Are you boys so hard up that you spend time speculating if you saw the real thing or not? What is the big deal? Even if she DID show her naughty bits, who cares? We ALL have them! What is it about female body parts that turn men into complete and total idiots?
photoshops, fakes, and a pathetic cry for attention. is this the best you can do?
Y’all just can’t find anything decent to publish? Jennifer’s a beautiful lady, doesn’t even come CLOSE to looking like a man. Just leave her alone. I’m sure y’all wouldn’t want to be talked about like this.
I don,t see any snapper
ME NEITHER….
i don’t see any fur
The REAL goods are in pic #3…that camera man is HOT!!!
Ohhh … yeaaaah ;]
brazillian, anyone. WAX on WAX Off.
That is not Aniston! Its a guy for God’s sake. Look at his leg.
Jennifer is a lady, nothing like the slut Angie. So, leave her alone.
This pic doesn’t prove anything or show anything besides a leg that I doubt is Jen Anistons. It’s rather thick in the thigh and it’s a god awful reach to say it shows her vagina. Good Lord guys get a grip on reality.
Okay maybe it was her but it shows nothing so intimate. Your imaginations are in the gutter.
It looks like a vagina to me, but it is not the best picture of one. I think it is photo shopped, because it is not in the “correct” place.
we don’t see it. all we see is an upper leg. we also think that too many are seeing what they WANT to see.
I see no bearded clam
I don’t know if it is or not. Who can tell anymore with all this shaven nonsense going on. I miss bush.
You’re sick.