ESC

The Selena Gomez Topless Photo Is Fake

Hollyscoop was approached with a supposed topless photo of Selena Gomez that was taken with a camera phone. I assume they saw it because they said “we’re not going to publish the photo because we can’t verify that she was over 18 when it was taken.” They say the photo was taken inside a bathroom by someone else and Selena is posing in front of a closed door.

Regardless, the photo is fake. Sources tell TMZ that Selena and her people are angry that her reputation is being tarnished by a pervert with Photoshop and that any site publishing it will be hit with a cease and desist and possibly a lawsuit. “The alleged photo of Selena Gomez is absolutely not her. Selena’s family is pursuing all available remedies to deal with the offender.”

That’s great and all but either my Google skills suck today or no one has even published the fakes (censored version here). Basically this story could have been summed up with just “Tits or GTFO!”

16
Leave a Reply

avatar
13 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
15 Comment authors
Diamond1107Ferret1993@yahoo.comJoshua SalazarDHLTech&WepLleckey Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
EAD
Guest
EAD

This is for certain a fake photo! Because as you can see on this photo there is no mole (or Beauty mark) on her right breast. The REAL Selena Gomez has one there.

Lleckey
Guest
Lleckey

U r a perv how would u know she has
one on her breast

Ssilentwaiting
Guest
Ssilentwaiting

This is a lie. The image is most definitely fake.

there is the fact that on Selena’s face, the flash of the camera was much more intense which causes a bright glare, while the rest of the body does not have as much glare.

oh and of course i can’t forget the irrefutable proof of THE ORIGINAL PICTURE OF SELENA! (http://i51.tinypic.com/oumple.jpg) and boom goes the dynamite! i give you the original picture from which Selena’s face was cut out of. She was at the LAX airport on January 23, 2009.

Joshua Salazar
Guest
Joshua Salazar

Dude!! Thx for clearing up the original pic

-JOSH-

Violeta
Guest
Violeta

The photo is fake. I’ve seen that particular photo since last year. It was featured on a site that included other fake photos of celebrities. I was really surprised to find out that the infamous photo that got everyone talking about was actually the fake photo I saw last year. The photo is obviously fake, No mole on her breast and she has never had a dang mullet. Plus the bathroom in that photo looks like something you would find in Eastern Europe. Fake.

Aw090
Guest
Aw090

Im pretty sure when doing topless pictures you don’t go for a haggard I could use a a good nights sleep look. Her hairs is a mess and she looks like she just stepped off a plane. To me that right there says it is a fake. This was definitely not a sexy picture Other than that the photoshopping looks pretty realistic and I no nothing of whether she has a mole or not.

Jack Hill
Guest
Jack Hill

Its REAL, just google it.

MAVERICK517
Guest
MAVERICK517

The Selena Photo is definitely a fake. The necklace is the joint where her head was combined with a photo of a nude body. Simply zoom in on the necklace until you see the pixels and you can clearly see that the borders of the necklace do not match the skin tones. It was definitely Photoshopped.

Gizmo
Guest
Gizmo

Her tits aint that size no way

Llleckey
Guest
Llleckey

You r all dicks u r. Also bitches leave her personal life alone peeved

DHLTech&Wep
Guest
DHLTech&Wep

Now my turn, the photo is fake. Why? Here is why, if you notice the setting of the place it look like trash. If it is her I believe it would be much better decor, and even if Justin took the pictutre it is Justin’s house. He still won’t have a shit like home, and if guys look even closer yes there is a beauty mark on her right chest. But it other photo the marks is much more darker and visible. I did a little math the scale the of the photo the mark is about 4 inches from… Read more »

Ferret1993@yahoo.com
Guest

What you have to remember is that on some cameras, the image is reversed from what the image really looked like. If you would, look at the left breast. Notice that mole-like mark in the spot where the “real” mole would be if the image was reversed? I’m not saying this is proof, but it’s reasonable doubt. No doubt the “original” image posted in the comments is close, but in the “topless” photo, the head is tilted to be straight again. If this is fake, the pervert really took his/her time into the details.

Diamond1107
Guest
Diamond1107

Okay it’s hidden and I’m not a perv I just sick of paparazzi she does really have a dot on her right boob and it is there you just can’t see it cause it’s so small I can see it

Diamond1107
Guest
Diamond1107

Okay it’s hidden and I’m not a perv I just sick of paparazzi she does really have a dot on her right boob and it is there you just can’t see it cause it’s so small I can see it

Mindtrip9
Guest
Mindtrip9

 nice that is the exact photo….maybe 1 day there will be a real one maybe…

Soulja4thalord
Guest
Soulja4thalord

He really is not a perv there is a pic she took for mag cover and her dress is so low in the breast spot that on her right upper breast there is a mole and not that hard to miss soooooo choke on that and die

Latest
Load more