ESC

This Olivia Munn Maxim Cover Is Controversial

Olivia Munn is in the February 2011 issue of Maxim in a pair of see-through panties. Naturally, people (read: bored housewives and puritanical fameballs) are calling out the cover.

Dan Gainor, Vice President of Business & Culture at the Media Research Center says “it’s disgusting” and “Maxim has moved their magazine from tawdry to full-on pornography.” I imagine he said this with such vim and vigor that spittle flew out of his mouth, through the telephone and onto the reporter’s face.

“Any store could have children coming in. If I were a parent, and I walked into a store and saw that cover, I would make a scene until the manager hid it.” Wow. This guy doesn’t even have children and he’s getting butt hurt over this.

Far be it for me to defend Olivia Munn — I’m all for banning her from all media until she stops pandering to her fans — but this guy is a nut. You can barely see through those panties. I jerked off to the cover maybe once. Therefore, not pornography. I hope he falls off his soapbox and breaks his neck. No, that’s mean. Maybe a cracked vertebrae or some injury that everyone can laugh at.

12
Leave a Reply

avatar
10 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
JenPosterchildMuglyPatrolRaina Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Galicja
Guest
Galicja

This cover is so totally airbrushed. Why can’t women have natural, meaty thighs and still be on the cover of Maxim?

The Blemish
Guest

There’s a rule that says “No woman’s thighs shall touch in a photoshoot.”

Spikeanddru
Guest
Spikeanddru

Fat women always say that.

Munnstr
Guest
Munnstr

She only likes big cocks, so maybe she wants to show she has plenty of room between her legs.

Laura Pearce
Guest

I love the magazine’s top line grabber “threesome operatar’s manual”. besides her panties are nothing more than what you would see in a Victoria’s Secret mag…

notyourbussiness
Guest
notyourbussiness

the body is hot but her face is quite ugly…..

Raina
Guest
Raina

Dead eyes.

uglyPatrol
Guest
uglyPatrol

She is busted.

M
Guest

I didn’t even notice those panties were see-through

Posterchild
Guest
Posterchild

LOL, I work at Macy’s in Philly and we have an 8 foot tall cardboard display of a woman in our lingerie department that has a see through bra AND panty set on.

Jen
Guest
Jen

wow cant believe this caused controversey…u cant see anything and maxim always posts provocative pics. i also disagree with the allegation of :”pandering to her fans” if it were true she would still be on AOTS :(

Cletis
Guest
Cletis

I for one am shocked and appalled that there is no outrage at the violent removal of Olivia’s navel by the Photoshop Gestapo! Have none of you any morals at all? What about the children? And the children’s belly buttons?!

Latest
Load more