Justin Bieber Was a ‘Brat’ on ‘CSI’

Justin Bieber played a troubled teen in two episodes of CSI. He met with a violent end after a stand-off with police. Now we may know why.

In an interview with French radio show Le Grand Direct des Medias last Friday (via NYDN), Marg Helgenberger (Catherine Willows) said, “I probably shouldn’t say this, but he was kind of a brat.” She explained the Biebs was nice to her in the one scene they shared but was horrible to the rest of the crew.

“He locked one of the producers in a closet,” she recounted. “And he put his fist through a cake that was on the craft services table.” What a tough guy. Grr!

Justin Bieber apologists will argue he was merely staying in character. On the other hand, Justin Bieber apologists include 12-year-old girls who, at that age, are more irrational than the normal woman and can only communicate through high-pitched shrieks. Point is, their opinions are worthless. So to answer your question, yes, fame has gotten to Bieber’s head.

Granted, if an androgynous 16-year-old locks you in a closet, you deserve it for being a pansy. What didn’t deserve anything though was that cake. It was probably delicious. What an asshole.

  • Mare

    If Mayweather is so upset by this, he deserves to lose.

  • ivan

    Safe to say you all are a piece of shit for bullying this kid who does nothing but go to church and mind his own business; the fact is this guy is lying; he previously showed he approved of Justin wearing that shirt by wearing a Justin Bieber shirto-there are pictures; he’s using Justin for publicity since, lo and behold, he has an album coming out; there is absolutely no proof Justin said that to him; one can say anything about another celeb; it’s contrary to Justin’s character as people who really know him can tell you; furthermore, he had nothing to do with the design of the shirt. He just wore it.

    • BigJimSlade

      Go back to Canada, Justin.
      And pull up your damn pants.

  • RocknRollerBlues

    Since when is China a moral authority anyone cares about or “running” over a paparazzo standing in the path of a moving vehicle while bombarding the driver with flash anything but the pap’s own fault?

    Also, the writer of this steaming pile of caka should go write the word “journalism” infinity times and think about what that means. This excuse for an “article” is nothing more than hate speech. Shameful.

Load more