Hugh Hefner didn’t like the first shoot Lindsay Lohan did for Playboy’s January issue. He felt it was too Kate Moss inspired which seems appropriate. For whatever reason, Hef wanted the shoot to look more Marilyn Monroe-y. Sort of, wait no, exactly like the shoot Lindsay did for NY Mag. So the old man told her to go back for a reshoot. Also, Lindsay won’t be doing full frontal anymore. Boo! Hiss!
“He felt the initial shots looked too much like a Kate Moss-inspired fashion story — Lindsay’s choice — where he wanted more of a classic Hollywood Marilyn Monroe feel,” a source said. This weekend, Lohan was accompanied by lawyers, agents and publicists who, sources said, “gave their two cents about what was considered ‘nude’ and what was not.” Sources said Lohan ended up delivering the Monroe-inspired images Hefner wanted. She’s expected to appear nude, but “strategically covered up” in certain shots. Page Six
Let me get this straight. They’re paying Lindsay close to a million to be naked but her handlers want to strategically place her hands and turn her towards a certain angle so you can’t see anything. And Playboy wonders why it’s heading for obsolescence and bankruptcy. Instead of publishing semi-nudes, they should just write “F**K YOU” in big red letters on their covers from now on.
They are so off on this one. She is far from being the Marilyn Monroe type.
They ALMOST had me. I’ve seen the T and the A hundreds of times. Thought finally we would get a full-on shot of the squirrel. I would have $6 ($7?) for that shot. but they blew it.
if by her being “marilyn monroe”-ish she’ll be dead soon and everyone can STFU and GTFO the airways about her… then im ok with it
Unless i see puss, not interested. If i wanna see her puss, otherwise, ill look at the paparzzi pics of her puss.
Lindsay’s hair looks like a dried out straw haystack! Marilyn Monroe is overrated and Lindsay is way too freckle laden & skanky.